| Notes
provided by: Charlotte R.
Pierce
School Committee Meeting — January 27, 2004
Meeting called to order at 7:30 pm by Chair, Suzanne Owayda.
Public Participation
Amy Cohen, president of the town wide PTO and Ottoson
parent reported on a Jan. 28 meeting of elementary PTO presidents and
noted that reported concern regarding teacher contract negotiations. Elementary
school PTOs said that the spirit draining out of the schools, there is
volunteer burnout, and teachers are frustrated. Recognizing the difficulty
of the negotiations, Cohen asked the committee for some kind of initiative
that would produce even a bit of progress for people to hold onto.
Outstanding Friends of Public Education Award to ASF
Paul Schlichtman in his role as president of the Mass.
Association of School Committees and Glenn Koocher, executive director
of MASC, presented the Outstanding Friends of Public Education Award for
an "unprecedented bit of philanthropy" to the Arlington Partners
in Education (now Arlington Schools Foundation). Board members Julie Dunn,
Cindy Friedman, Judi Bohn, Donna Eidson, and Leslie Mayer accepted the
award. Julie Dunn recognized the contributors who "came through in
an incredible way."
Superintendent's Contract
The School Committee next conducted a public vote on the
superintendent's contract, which it had already deliberated in executive
session. Kay Donovan's current contract was due to expire in July, when
Ms. Donovan had planned to retire. In discussion prior to the vote, Suzanne
said that Kay had agreed to extend her retirement until 2005, and that
the SC and Kay had been negotiating since late summer on this contract.
Even though fiscal '05 is looking a little better than 04, Suzanne noted
that Kay's leadership was still needed on such projects as the Peirce
field remediation, the Dallin rebuild, and AHS accreditation; and that
the extension would give the SC and community time to conduct a thorough
superintendent search. Kay's current salary is less than those of superintendents
in equivalent communities ($124K vs. $135-150K in surrounding communities).
Suzanne noted that this was "not inconsistent" with the current
offering to the teachers, and is the "fair and right" thing
to do. Other SC members noted that Kay did not take health insurance benefits
like other superintendents, and that in addition to than other towns,
and that the SC is "extremely fortunate" to have someone they
can work well with; that she had manned the phones during override, and
is out several nights per week doing extra work. The SC also voted Kay
a retroactive salary increase in various stages to July 2002.
AHS Curriculum
APS curriculum director
Joanne Gurry presented a review of issues at AHS, starting with the no
pre-requisite policy. Referring to the packet she had distributed to the
SC, Gurry noted that this policy was "not voted in isolation"
but that discussion and debate goes back to 2002. Gurry referenced the
packet with comparison with other communities, including Brookline, which
eliminated AP requirements, and experienced a 65% increase in enrollment
in AP courses over when there were prerequisites. Gurry explained that
the move comes in the context of charged environment of budget reductions,
postponement of new graduation requirements. A report from AHS department
heads showed that many students took advantage of policy, especially freshmen.
However, juniors and seniors clearly made more informed decisions. A better
system for advising 8th and 9th grade students will help. Gurry also noted
that the packet includes results that are based only on reporting from
one term (Fall 2003) of students taking a course not at their recommended
level. In general, students did satisfactory work (C or better), though
the administration is continuing to collect data and study the prerequisite
policy. She noted that the change was made in the spirit of improving
access and achievement levels.
SC Discussion of
AHS Curriculum Issues
Sue Sheffler said
she had a "great deal of trouble with this policy. With a load of
200 students per guidance counselor, adequate advising of parents, teachers,
and students is not possible, she said. Suggested skill levels are not
clear to most parents, and there is no structure in place for parents
to consult with teachers moving up a level. Ostensibly there is better
access to AP courses, but actually the policy allows students to enter
classes in which the teacher is forced to deal with widely different skill
levels without adequate resources to do so. Belmont requires certain grade,
more requirements before allowed to go up a level, Sheffler noted.
Barbara Goodman differed,
seeing positive indications in the first-quarter data, and said that it
was "no doubt the right thing to do."
Marty Thrope noted
that he understands the concept of no prerequisites, but has concerns
about implementation, and said that "nothing speaks to the teachers'
concerns. Also, he questioned that there is a risk of reducing the challenge,
or "dumbing down" as teachers struggle to keep all students
learning the material.
One SC member cited
two math classes that are both behind where they were last year at this
time, with teachers spending more time on sections than previously. These
accommodations can cheat both those who are struggling and those who are
not. It was noted that the biggest gap was between 8th & 9th grade
and that transitioning "needs help" or the result could be selection
inflation, accompanied by content deflation. The new policy may be better
than gate-keeping through prerequisites, but there needs to be sufficient
discussion and transitioning.
Jeff Thielman felt
it was too soon to judge on one term's data, though he was "never
comfortable with how policy was put together," with faculty not involved
in the decision. He put forth a few recommendations to improve selection
by students & parents: 1) continue to improve counseling and clarity
of choices; 2) include both grade 7 and 8 parents; 3) provide orientation
for grades 7 and 8 guidance staff; 4) revise the scheduling form to include
recommendation and print skills sets on the back of the registration form;
and 5) track performance of all students who select non-recommended courses
for 04-05.
Paul Schlichtman noted
that the schools "should not protect students from their own success"
and saw prerequisites as a civil rights issue. The situation was made
more difficult this year because of the lack of options and increased
class size. We don't want to go backward to a worse way, and we do need
to enforce the rigor of courses. "I am confident this will happen
here as it has elsewhere," Schlichtman said.
Joani LaMacchia stated
that access to higher level courses is a "good thing," but cited
budget constraints over the past year as a complicating factor. AHS principal
Woodcock identified some beginning points, she said, but there needs to
be more detailing, more timelines, perhaps a task force to identify practical
steps.
Marty Thrope stated
he would be happy to guide a task force to study prerequisites.
Kay Donovan noted
that "we need to fight for the funds to make this happen" (175
more periods to meet 2008 graduation requirements.)
Suzanne Owayda emphasized
the need for continued attention to the issue; it was moved to approve
the program of studies and graduation requirements with certain additions,
and the motion passed.
Policy & Procedures
There was a lively
debate about whether the SC should develop policy initiatives in subcommittee
or in public meetings, with Barbara Goodman expressing "serious concerns"
about the lack of public input if issues are initiated away from public
view. Jeff Thielman noted that the bylaws indicate that issues can generate
anywhere, as long as there is a final vote in the public meeting. Marty
said he was comfortable with the current process of bringing issues to
the table, either in subcommittee or in the public forum. Paul Schlichtman
said he though the subcommittees were find for minor issues, but that
major policy shifts should begin with the full committee. Suzanne Owayda
noted that it was the duty of the SC chair to be aware of what all the
subcommittees are discussing, and to open the discussions to the public
if appropriate. Barbara countered that the initial phase should have the
broadest public input, and that issues being discussed needed to be brought
out in public on every issue. Joani LaMacchia said that there are many
ways to increase communication and that a clear process and policy needs
to be established. The SC voted 6 to 1 to approve the policy of allowing
issues to generate in subcommittee, with Barbara Goodman dissenting.
Budget Transfer Authority
Next came a discussion
of Paul Schlichtman's amendment to the budget transfer authority, calling
for the the superintendent to submit a revised budget by the first meeting
of the SC in the fall. Jeff Thielman said he would vote against the amendment,
saying "it makes more sense to have working budget after all hiring
is finalized; which this year was into October. Barbara Goodman supported
that concept, noting that there are so many assumptions in a public school
system that more time needs to be allowed. The amendment passed, with
Marty, Jeff and Sue voting no.
School Bus Advertising
The issue of allowing
advertising on school buses was voted down, with discussion centering
on the fact that potential revenue ($12K) was not significant enough to
go through process. Most SC members voiced a distaste for the idea. However,
the temporary display of advertising at athletic fields, which had been
endorsed by the subcommittee and approved.
Other Discussion
After an executive
session for a grievance matter, the SC discussed the circuit breaker for
SPED. Level funding for SPED assistance is anticipated in '04-'05. It
was noted that the Governor Romney spoke of borrowing to pay for the rebuilding
of 100 schools, which would deliver 63% of expenses upfront, allowing
for rebuilding Dallin and remediation of the Peirce field.
There was some discussion
of an upcoming joint meeting with the Board of Selectmen. The School Committee
meeting ended about 11 p.m.
SPOT
offers these notes as a service to the community.
SPOT
is an organization of concerned parents and community members who are
interested in full, equitable and sound financing of our public education.
We regret any errors and omissions. |